CRM
Read records, check duplicates, retrieve pipeline state, identify missing fields, prepare updates and create approved tasks.
Example systemsHubSpot · Salesforce · Pipedrive · Other CRMsTandem integrations
Connect Tandem to the systems your business already relies on so agents can use the right context, move work between tools and keep repetitive processes moving.
No rip-and-replace required.
Integration categories
Vendor names below are examples, not a claim of universal or currently native support.
Read records, check duplicates, retrieve pipeline state, identify missing fields, prepare updates and create approved tasks.
Example systemsHubSpot · Salesforce · Pipedrive · Other CRMsDetect relevant messages, gather context, categorise, prepare replies and surface actions. Sending is not automatic by default.
Example systemsGoogle Workspace / Gmail · Microsoft 365 / OutlookIdentify meetings, trigger preparation, add context and create approved tasks.
Example systemsGoogle Calendar · Outlook CalendarSend internal notifications, surface approvals, route exceptions and deliver reports.
Example systemsSlack · Microsoft TeamsReceive enquiries, trigger workflows, structure submissions and create or update records.
Example systemsWebsite · lead · onboarding formsRead approved data, update structured records, reconcile information and support reporting.
Example systemsPostgres · Google Sheets · Excel · internal databasesUse research context, sales triggers, pipeline support and approved enrichment or activity data.
Category exampleFeasibility confirmed during discoverySource of truth
Define the authoritative system, use stable identifiers, check existing records, preserve source relationships and avoid silent conflicts.
Tandem should help your systems agree, not create another place for them to disagree.
Approval gates
People can remain between system context and consequential actions.
Approved → CRM updated
Human review required before send.
Illustrative workflows
Workflow logic
Every connection should define its trigger, required information, source system, read and write scope, approval, failure path, conflict handling and duplicate prevention.
Duplicates
Retries should not create the same record twice.
Failure handling
Failures can include expired access, missing fields, denied permission, conflicts or rate limits.
Security-conscious design
Audit trail
Illustrative activity.
Integration feasibility
We confirm integration feasibility before it becomes part of the agreed implementation scope.
Depending on risk, maintainable alternatives may include approved exports/imports, structured files, forms, email-driven workflows, database access, manual approvals or replacing one isolated step.
The goal is the safest maintainable workflow, not forcing automation into every system.Staged rollout
Capability can expand as confidence grows.
Illustrative architecture
Example systems by category
These are categories and examples—not a supported-integration directory.
Credentials
Where possible, clients own accounts and authorise scoped access. Dedicated service credentials may be used where supported, and access can be revoked.
No shared passwords passed around in documents or prompts.What we need
System names, an owner/admin contact, access approval, test access where available, field definitions, source-of-truth decisions, restrictions and security requirements.
You do not need to understand APIs. We need someone who can authorise the right access.AI Workforce Audit
The Audit considers systems, data, feasibility, permissions, source-of-truth rules, approvals and complexity.
Explore the AI Workforce AuditFind the opportunity first
Identify the repetitive work before worrying about technical connections.
Take the free Tandem AssessmentIntegrations FAQ
Technical feasibility is always confirmed during discovery.
Usually no. Tandem generally works with existing systems where integration is practical.
Potentially, where the platform and client permissions support the workflow.
No. Only the access needed for the agreed workflow should be used.
Where appropriate and approved, yes. Some actions may remain behind approval.
The workflow should fail safely, surface the exception and retry or escalate as designed.
Potentially. Feasibility depends on APIs, data access, documentation and security requirements.
No. Vendor names are examples of systems businesses may use. Feasibility is confirmed during discovery.
No rip-and-replace required.
Take the free Tandem Assessment and find the repetitive workflows where connecting your existing systems could give your team back meaningful capacity.